It's been surprising how much of this discussion has grown in a positive direction and people are tempering their expectations to be more realistic. I think a big difference between GG1.0 & 2.0 is that this time around there are more institutional actors & people who learned the correct lessons the last time around.
Obviously this isn't true of everyone & there's lots more for people to grow, or I guess in some cases, to be ignored, but overall it feels like it's more positive than negative to me.
Anything still goes. But you're right in that unlike GG 1.0, more people are aware of what went wrong before, and aren't keen on repeating the same mistakes.
Great piece!
It's been surprising how much of this discussion has grown in a positive direction and people are tempering their expectations to be more realistic. I think a big difference between GG1.0 & 2.0 is that this time around there are more institutional actors & people who learned the correct lessons the last time around.
Obviously this isn't true of everyone & there's lots more for people to grow, or I guess in some cases, to be ignored, but overall it feels like it's more positive than negative to me.
Anything still goes. But you're right in that unlike GG 1.0, more people are aware of what went wrong before, and aren't keen on repeating the same mistakes.
Seems to be a recurring trend.